Posts Tagged ‘business’

Yoga … Sangha … Business? - Thoughts for Twitter

Tuesday, August 25th, 2009
(find me on twitter at http://twitter.com/presentjoyoga)

I’ve gotten called a “guru” on twitter. *runs and hides*.. I’ve been referenced online as one of the top ten in the yoga community on Twitter

On Following

1. Don’t follow back everyone. Some disagree with this. But see #5.
2. Follow back yogis who tweet valuable stuff - community leaders, teachers, studios in various areas, etc. There aren’t competitors on twitter, as far as I’m concerned, although there can be dissension and disagreement amongst yogis.The studio down the street? Not sure. But Twitter is a public forum, and I believe the possible best course of action is to follow, follow away! Even RT some of their stuff, if it’s valuable quotes or their own charity endeavours (of course you don’t want to tweet their marketing stuff)… if you’re uncomfortable with this idea (um, it is a BUSINESS after all), then create a personal account that is somewhat anonymous, and follow them through there, to keep tabs on how they’re using twitter.
3. Follow back “event broadcasters” and other leaders in the toronto area.
4. Wherever possible follow back actual clients/members of the studio, to develop an online personal relationship with them.
5. Cull your followers — as much as possible remove the spam accounts. There’s a fine line and sometimes it’s hard to tell. Some people will look at a person’s follows as a measure of whether to follow back; some people will look at a person’s follower count (ie the popularity contest — even better, is the following:follower ratio. If you are followed more than you follow, you evoke a different thing than if you follow hundreds more than who follows you..). It can be different for a business (not sure how), but in general I would say that it’s better to keep your news feed to two groups: those you want to follow because they interest you, regardless of whether they follow back. For example, an account that broadcasts Buddha quotes. You may wish to RT them a lot. Second, those who interact with you. This can be difficult, but try to follow whoever sends an @reply, if they are genuinely interacting with you.

Oh, the Automation

Please don’t automate anything about twitter. Instead, use a client like TweetDeck. Manage followers manually. Some “twitter marketers” will tell you how to get thousands of followers, and often recommend certain applications (not affiliated with twitter in any way). Beware. The people who actually use twitter, especially those in the yoga/spiritual community do NOT like these techniques, and smell them from miles away.

On @replies

Don’t underestimate the value of tweeting yogic messages that are very very very simple — Breathe. Bring awareness to the feeling of gravity in your body. Or quote patanjali. But also don’t neglect interacting. Respond to what interests you. Answer someone’s question, or ask your own, and be prepared to respond to most if not all replies to you. Try to reply to ALL @replies or mentions. Some people thank every person who RTed them. People like to get mail (except bills or junk mail — equivalent of spam!), and they like to get mentions. I don’t tend to reply to every single RT but maybe I should. It comes down for me to time.

On Retweets (RTs)

The more you reference other yogis, the more they will be likely to reference you — RTing is therefore valuable in the sense that you are not only spreading information that will give other users a better picture of who YOU are, you are also “recommending” them in a very real sense, and you are letting that person you RTed know that you are following them and value their tweets. Also RT the people who RT you, IF that person is tweeting stuff of value. You want to follow them to do that.

BE PERSONAL

This is a point of interest for ANYONE who uses twitter as a business identity. What do you actually do? How do you sell? How can you make money on twitter?

OK. Breathe.

Tweet about your challenges. Tweet generically about your challenges! That’s right! People RELATE to that. Tweet about goings on, to an extent. Big events? Sure! Tweet that you’re getting married, or going on a cruise, or to India, or about how there’s a GIANT weed in your backyard that you might need to just appreciate because it’s too big and prickly to remove. Tweet about your personal choices for being ecologically minded — and do these things without tying into your business. In other words, there is a place for saying “my studio/business is eco” - but if that’s all you’re doing then you’ve just bought into “green marketing”.. which yogis and others in the know will smell as simple self-serving marketing jibber jabber.

OK What About Business?

Now, being personal is trickier if you actually have more than one person updating twitter for your business. I actually do NOT like “we”.. it kind of reeks of groupthink. Either refer to yourself in the third person — “Studio Y is excited to announce Jerry as a new addition to the team” or, simply just get one person to tweet. Or get multiple people to tweet “for” the business, but under different names. Let them engage in the yoga community as themselves. You can choose to make your business a broadcast business, and then have your “reps” RT important things. I don’t think this model would be as effective.

People have sent business my way because of twitter, but I believe this is because of my personal relationship with them. And I give things for free, I mean knowledge and stuff. Some businesses do the occasional product giveaway, if that works - it could be a free complimentary pass for one class. it could be random or could be “the best response” kind of thing. But this can be excessive. Continuous self-promotion is not effective in this community.

In other words, be a yogic entity first, and a business second. Be ethical. Avoid direct PMs or unsolicited @replies that are just sales pitches — like if you sought out users by their location and then tweeted to them “come check out our studio/my website!” - that is so close to spam, if not spam. it can depend on how it’s approached. if someone tweeted, for instance “i’m really struggling with my yoga practice” you could tweet back, “what do you think is a barrier to getting deeper into your practice?” and engage in a conversation with them. they can organically look at the fact you are a local studio by checking out your profile. or you can eventually gently say “noticed you’re in our area, we’d love for you to come in for a class on us; finding a “home” to do your yoga can raelly help with a regular practice.

Finally

What is your approach to yoga? Frame yourself not just from a branding point of view, but convey why you personally are running a yoga business, and what makes you passionate about it. the more personal the better. Use twitpic to post pictures of yourself, if you choose to have a company logo as your avatar.. keeping in mind that a company logo as avatar casts you as a business with less of a face attached to it. I’d say this is somewhat a personal preference and a business decision that is ultimately your judgment call.

And enjoy! Enjoy interacting. Support others. Support them freely! Without condition! You’ll be amazed at the energy created through that.

Feel free to add anything I’ve missed, plus opinions, in the comments. I’m interested to build on these ideas. Also, I’m not really trying to cast myself as someone who is hocking that “how to make money through yoga on twitter!” but to try and bring yoga businesses to the realization that they actually have to be part of the community first, and a business second. this is not specific to yoga, except I think the community here is far more sensitive to when it happens the other way around (business first, yoga - yamas and niyamas? second).

Namaste

marketing the small pond

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

Seth Godin writes a lot of interesting posts on marketing and design etc. yeah you’ve probably known about him for a long time. : )

this post caught my attention: http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/02/get-rich-quick.html

i think some entrepreneurs, i can at least empathize, start off in the networking community as seekers, and i imagine (at least this is my perception) discover that the same people are doing the seeking, over and over, recruiting others to seek as well (affiliate) and some stick, some don’t, but then… do some of these seekers begin to wonder whether they’re swimming in a small pond with fish that all can’t find the way to the ocean?

as a graphic artist and novice web designer, i’ve been really grappling with design questions. how to have a business that moves along the stream to larger waters, in the sense that it has substance. how to communicate that substance? content is king, right? how to marketing sales blitz letters have any substance? even if they are selling something “worthwhile” in the eyes of consumers or even the entrepreneur(s) themselves?

As long as there have been people who want to get rich, there have been get rich quick schemes. The guys who sell mailing lists have a name for people who buy these schemes: “opportunity seekers.”

Raising ostriches, or timing the market or investing in tulips–there’s a long history here. The schemes tend to have a few things in common. They tend to have the same tone of voice (part breathless, part bad design, part ‘we’re just like you’) and most of all, they are too good to be true.

this really keyed me into something important:

Online, of course, like most things online, this has blossomed. You’ll see the long long web pages filled with ALL CAPS and bright colors and testimonials and “wait there’s more!” They look alike for a reason–it’s a signal to the opportunity seeker that this is one of those.

*it’s a signal* — hmm. so in a sense, these pages with the ALL CAPS and bright colours are a signal — the bait that works the best to catch fish in the small pond.

of COURSE there are many who disagree with Seth Godin. and of course, i do not. i say again, it’s the bait that works best to catch fish in the small pond. it’s a type of generic “branding”. people make money off it. and yet i remain skeptical. if you read the article, skepticism in the seeker is very important. except the bait doesn’t work for me.

honestly, i think the law of attraction is similar, in the sense that the language is a *signal*. it’s not that the LOA is a bunch of hooey, exactly. LOA is based in very very old spiritual wisdom. However the current trend is language stripped of substance, somehow, a drug that lures the seekers and leaves them there, kind of like weight loss programs, leaving people hungry for more and not entirely sure why they can’t shut off all the negative thoughts in order to attract only the positive. why are they stuck?? well, so that they’ll keep coming back for more, that’s why. LOA stripped of its hindu, buddhist, and i think kabbalic roots is like yoga stripped of all the philosophy — a great exercise, makes you feel good, but like a drug that has very temporary effects. even when its peddlers insist that there is more substance there. yes, there is, in ancient texts, that have a lot more to say than the LOA marketers and coaching, have a LOT of depth, and wait — they’re free? what?

you can read, for instance, The Upanishads and if you find the old texts inaccessible to you, look for commentary, and as much as you can find. from published sources. read the dalai lama, who is quite accessible. (search on Amazon for his books here)

i think about those five questions - what, who, when, and how. and then why. there are combinations of these, right? all hinging around the why.. as each person around the circle, or at every stage of the business has a why. there is a why-what, a why-who, a why-when, and a why-how. communications design falls into a few of these, or all of these. very important, i think, is the why-who and why-how. when designing a web page one has to ask both these questions.

who are you talking to, and why?
how are you talking to them, and why?