Posts Tagged ‘teaching’

Yoga … Sangha … Business? - Thoughts for Twitter

Tuesday, August 25th, 2009
(find me on twitter at http://twitter.com/presentjoyoga)

I’ve gotten called a “guru” on twitter. *runs and hides*.. I’ve been referenced online as one of the top ten in the yoga community on Twitter

On Following

1. Don’t follow back everyone. Some disagree with this. But see #5.
2. Follow back yogis who tweet valuable stuff - community leaders, teachers, studios in various areas, etc. There aren’t competitors on twitter, as far as I’m concerned, although there can be dissension and disagreement amongst yogis.The studio down the street? Not sure. But Twitter is a public forum, and I believe the possible best course of action is to follow, follow away! Even RT some of their stuff, if it’s valuable quotes or their own charity endeavours (of course you don’t want to tweet their marketing stuff)… if you’re uncomfortable with this idea (um, it is a BUSINESS after all), then create a personal account that is somewhat anonymous, and follow them through there, to keep tabs on how they’re using twitter.
3. Follow back “event broadcasters” and other leaders in the toronto area.
4. Wherever possible follow back actual clients/members of the studio, to develop an online personal relationship with them.
5. Cull your followers — as much as possible remove the spam accounts. There’s a fine line and sometimes it’s hard to tell. Some people will look at a person’s follows as a measure of whether to follow back; some people will look at a person’s follower count (ie the popularity contest — even better, is the following:follower ratio. If you are followed more than you follow, you evoke a different thing than if you follow hundreds more than who follows you..). It can be different for a business (not sure how), but in general I would say that it’s better to keep your news feed to two groups: those you want to follow because they interest you, regardless of whether they follow back. For example, an account that broadcasts Buddha quotes. You may wish to RT them a lot. Second, those who interact with you. This can be difficult, but try to follow whoever sends an @reply, if they are genuinely interacting with you.

Oh, the Automation

Please don’t automate anything about twitter. Instead, use a client like TweetDeck. Manage followers manually. Some “twitter marketers” will tell you how to get thousands of followers, and often recommend certain applications (not affiliated with twitter in any way). Beware. The people who actually use twitter, especially those in the yoga/spiritual community do NOT like these techniques, and smell them from miles away.

On @replies

Don’t underestimate the value of tweeting yogic messages that are very very very simple — Breathe. Bring awareness to the feeling of gravity in your body. Or quote patanjali. But also don’t neglect interacting. Respond to what interests you. Answer someone’s question, or ask your own, and be prepared to respond to most if not all replies to you. Try to reply to ALL @replies or mentions. Some people thank every person who RTed them. People like to get mail (except bills or junk mail — equivalent of spam!), and they like to get mentions. I don’t tend to reply to every single RT but maybe I should. It comes down for me to time.

On Retweets (RTs)

The more you reference other yogis, the more they will be likely to reference you — RTing is therefore valuable in the sense that you are not only spreading information that will give other users a better picture of who YOU are, you are also “recommending” them in a very real sense, and you are letting that person you RTed know that you are following them and value their tweets. Also RT the people who RT you, IF that person is tweeting stuff of value. You want to follow them to do that.

BE PERSONAL

This is a point of interest for ANYONE who uses twitter as a business identity. What do you actually do? How do you sell? How can you make money on twitter?

OK. Breathe.

Tweet about your challenges. Tweet generically about your challenges! That’s right! People RELATE to that. Tweet about goings on, to an extent. Big events? Sure! Tweet that you’re getting married, or going on a cruise, or to India, or about how there’s a GIANT weed in your backyard that you might need to just appreciate because it’s too big and prickly to remove. Tweet about your personal choices for being ecologically minded — and do these things without tying into your business. In other words, there is a place for saying “my studio/business is eco” - but if that’s all you’re doing then you’ve just bought into “green marketing”.. which yogis and others in the know will smell as simple self-serving marketing jibber jabber.

OK What About Business?

Now, being personal is trickier if you actually have more than one person updating twitter for your business. I actually do NOT like “we”.. it kind of reeks of groupthink. Either refer to yourself in the third person — “Studio Y is excited to announce Jerry as a new addition to the team” or, simply just get one person to tweet. Or get multiple people to tweet “for” the business, but under different names. Let them engage in the yoga community as themselves. You can choose to make your business a broadcast business, and then have your “reps” RT important things. I don’t think this model would be as effective.

People have sent business my way because of twitter, but I believe this is because of my personal relationship with them. And I give things for free, I mean knowledge and stuff. Some businesses do the occasional product giveaway, if that works - it could be a free complimentary pass for one class. it could be random or could be “the best response” kind of thing. But this can be excessive. Continuous self-promotion is not effective in this community.

In other words, be a yogic entity first, and a business second. Be ethical. Avoid direct PMs or unsolicited @replies that are just sales pitches — like if you sought out users by their location and then tweeted to them “come check out our studio/my website!” - that is so close to spam, if not spam. it can depend on how it’s approached. if someone tweeted, for instance “i’m really struggling with my yoga practice” you could tweet back, “what do you think is a barrier to getting deeper into your practice?” and engage in a conversation with them. they can organically look at the fact you are a local studio by checking out your profile. or you can eventually gently say “noticed you’re in our area, we’d love for you to come in for a class on us; finding a “home” to do your yoga can raelly help with a regular practice.

Finally

What is your approach to yoga? Frame yourself not just from a branding point of view, but convey why you personally are running a yoga business, and what makes you passionate about it. the more personal the better. Use twitpic to post pictures of yourself, if you choose to have a company logo as your avatar.. keeping in mind that a company logo as avatar casts you as a business with less of a face attached to it. I’d say this is somewhat a personal preference and a business decision that is ultimately your judgment call.

And enjoy! Enjoy interacting. Support others. Support them freely! Without condition! You’ll be amazed at the energy created through that.

Feel free to add anything I’ve missed, plus opinions, in the comments. I’m interested to build on these ideas. Also, I’m not really trying to cast myself as someone who is hocking that “how to make money through yoga on twitter!” but to try and bring yoga businesses to the realization that they actually have to be part of the community first, and a business second. this is not specific to yoga, except I think the community here is far more sensitive to when it happens the other way around (business first, yoga - yamas and niyamas? second).

Namaste

when i speak from my experience

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009

the language of i

many of us have heard of i statements.

for instance, instead of “you are annoying,” it’s less harmful to say “i am feeling very annoyed with you right now.”

this is advice often given to parents, i suppose to try and avoid equating child with behaviour and casting certain individuals to lifelong identities of crime and misdemeanor.

in other words, “i statement” means no name calling.

the practice of ahimsa means to cultivate non-violence. violence can be with words, not just actions, like bopping someone over the head with a gopher because they’re being annoying. name calling is a kind of violence.

but there’s more..

there’s another (lack of) use of ‘i’ statements that i really want to talk about here. it’s pervasive, and i don’t know how far back this useage goes.

i’ll lay a (fictional-but-based-on-real-life) scene out for you. it’s between an unnamed but very successful talk show host, and her interviewee.

Host: “so tell me, ivan, what were you feeling leading up to the moment you killed your wife?”

ivan: “well, you know. hmm. you know you feel like you’ve been managing for a lot of years, and you even convince yourself you’re happy sometimes, you know? and then, like, one day, you don’t know if there’s any point in trying anymore, you don’t believe it’s going to change. and then you, like, you just start having thoughts, and at first you can dismiss them but they just build and build until you can’t put them out of your mind, and it seems the only way to get rid of them is for you to do something…”

wait. what? i’m ivan, and i’m a killer? is famous host a killer? who is the “you” he is referring to?

a couple things about this:

  • ivan didn’t answer the question, at least linguistically. he didn’t say “*i* was feeling this, that and the other, and then *i* felt this way.”
  • he wasn’t in the past tense, he was in the present tense. grammatically then, he was decoupling the situation from its moment in time.
  • by using ‘you’ instead of ‘i’, ivan was disavowing his experience. meaning, when he said “you feel this” he disidentified with his words. he placed them on his listener. perhaps this was a way of subconsciously trying to gain identification from his listeners, so that he himself didn’t feel like a monster. i mean, anyone can kill their wife, right? what he described is common enough experience so “you could be feeling this too”… right?

this is an extreme example of “you” language. it should be acknowledged, though i’m not grammatician, that the use of ‘proverbial you’ i believe is useful and needed at times. but i think it’s overused to the point of being a sign — a symptom if you will, of how alienated people are from themselves.

ok, but i’m not a psychopathic killer

compare these two passages, an example of a mundane situation that is more relatable (perhaps):

when you approach the speaker at the drive thru, sometimes they answer right away but sometimes you can wait forever for someone to come. you can’t always hear them well, and they usually mess up your order. then, they don’t always tell you what window to pull up to, so you take a slow.. pass by the first window and if there’s no one there, you assume it’s the second window. when they hand you the change, it’s always coins on top of bills which you can’t understand, because change in the hand first is a lot more secure.

i find that when i go to a drive thru, there are times when i have to wait a while before someone serves me. i have a hard time hearing the person through the intercom. i find they often get my order incorrect, but that may be because i always take cheese and lettuce off my order, so it’s a special case. i’m often also not really sure where to pay, and i find the transfer of money is awkward because a lot of cashiers like to put the change on top of the bills and receipts, which seems very unstable to me.

i think it’s palpable, the difference between these two passages, which are essentially saying the same thing.

the second is grounded in one person’s — the speaker’s — experience.

it communicates the specificity of their account, but doesn’t exclude the possibility of someone identifying with some or all of it.

they aren’t imposing the experience on the listener, they are owning their own perspective and voice.

a meditation on this concept

i bring this to my awareness. i notice how others are speaking about their experiences. i notice if i am using “you” language when i speak. i notice how it feels to use “i” language.

namaste

yogatree

Friday, February 6th, 2009
February 10, 2009
1:30 pmto3:00 pm
February 15, 2009
10:00 amto11:30 am
March 13, 2009
6:00 pmto7:15 pm
March 14, 2009
2:00 pmto3:30 pm

great news!

i’ll be teaching more classes at yogatree in thornhill and richmond hill!

at the time of this post:

  • feb 10th @ 1:30pm yogatree thornhill
  • feb 15th @ 10am yogatree thornhill

more dates to come in late march. check the calendar!

you can also find my teaching schedule online at yogatag.com

i know there is more than one yogatree. i’m talking about the one in north toronto, canada.

openings

Friday, February 6th, 2009

i want to put aside the law of attraction and any motivational shtuff for a moment. okay.

the ideas coming out of western adoption of “yogic hinduism”, buddhism, i ching, well, they’re very interesting and creative, current, timely and perhaps more palatable versions of the deep wellspring that is ancient wisdom.

i’m new at this, but i’ve been doing it for thousands of years. i’m a ‘budding buddhist’; i am only beginning to realize the extent of my suffering; i am only beginning to tease out the illusions and attachments i have suffered under

so, i’m riding the wave of life as a fledgling. i’m stumbling, withdrawing, protesting, posturing, and striving my way to some sort of greater awareness. yoga has helped me. judaism has helped me. buddhism has helped me. so have yoga teacher training, psychotherapy, anthropology graduate school, my lovers, my failures, and everything in between.

i graduated as a certified kripalu yoga teacher in august 2008. it was an incredible experience, and it showed me pieces of myself i had thought disappeared. my lover, who had ended things a short time before my training, saw me in this new state and in a way realized that i was deeper and stronger than i’d seemed. he opened, as i began to open.

pain

like many souls - if not all souls - on the journey, my heart has known great pain. i think it’s because of this pain that i’ve grown a compassionate heart. my challenges are mental and physical. sometimes i feel as though i am the finest seismograph to the emotional landscape.

i spent a lot of years closed off — or trying to close off — the intensity of emotion that i experience. looking into people’s eyes sometimes hurts. physical proximity stirs up a lot, and i draw back. the presence of my own self has been too much to bear, at times. “i” needed to disappear. depression and anxiety have been almost lifelong.

opening

the world has been opening, as i have been opening. it seems, actually, that these two things are not different, because i-being is not separate from world-being. there is no “out there” that isn’t a reflection of what is “in here”.

that is what i am learning from my current journey. as i open my heart, physically through yoga, emotionally through yoga, and even more through teaching yoga, i am becoming more connected with my suffering. i learned about witness consciousness, which is a way to observe the self, non-judgmentally. bring kind to myself has meant that i am doing less of that closing off. being kind to myself has made it possible for me to learn how to ask and receive kindness from others.

witnessing the ways i am being in the world has opened up realms of possibility. i see things i have to offer people, and i have opened enough to share some of them.

teaching yoga is one of those things. i was so afraid, i had no idea why anyone would want *me* to teach them yoga! however i have received such blessings from teaching. i continue to find a world open to me, as i open to myself.

attraction

what about attraction, then? i am sensing that i am not attracting things too me, as if they were being manifested by me — they were always already there.

so opening is a process of discovery. a treasure hunt!

in JOY,
namaste

injury and yoga

Friday, January 30th, 2009

today i am in pain. yesterday, i went to a yoga with a teacher i’m subbinng for next week. i wanted to experience her class to get a sense of how she teaches, thus what her students might expect, and how i can address what might be some expectations they’ll have.

attending classes as a teacher (known as such to the teacher) is a very particular and interesting experience. maybe i’ll discuss in another post.

this post is about pain. yes, pain. at ytt (yoga teacher training) i recall someone pointing out that there is a difference between pain and sensation. that it’s important to learn this, and teach students about this. the thing is, i’m having trouble with it.

i can tell when my joints are in pain. they’re either in pain, or not in pain. the joints get stressed - there is either ligament or tendon overstretch, or there is joint compression. ouch. many yoga teachers have trouble with knees, especially at first. so i’ve heard.

sensation and pain

tension and sensation vs. pain is a trickier one for me. when have i crossed that line? a few thoughts:

  • often crossing the edge means the breath has become constricted.
  • there is tension in other places in the body
  • the mind is striving, wanting to get further
  • um.

the thing is, all of these things kind of “surround” instead of describing the pain itself. they are byproducts, if you will. like, when it rains, there are generally clouds in the sky, or it is overcast; but that is a more distant feature or way of describing rain; being overcast is not sufficient or necessary to describe rain. what about saying that droplets of water hitting the ground and my face? that perhaps captures the direct experience of rain a bit more?

same with pain. however pain is not necessary to addressing the above list. for instance, striving. we need not cross into pain in order to examine how we are striving, and why. this is a worthy inquiry in itself.

a way out?

still, what to do with pain? it is necessary to protect the body, honour it, listen to what it is saying. pain is also a way of exploring suffering. chronic pain is one example of that. sometimes, pain manifests in ways that don’t come out of agency-based action (at least in a clear way).

so, what does the mind do with suffering? what is keeping me from causing myself more suffering? the path out of ignorance. this is what the seeker is seeking.

namaste, jai bhagwan